Why the Naming Causes Confusion The term CJC-1295 No DAC is widely used commercially, but it can be confusing because CJC-1295 in the scientific literature generally refers to the DAC-containing molecule . A more chemically precise distinction is: CJC-1295 with DAC : long-acting albumin-binding GHRH analog Modified GRF (1-29) : short-acting, no-DAC GHRH analog often sold as CJC-1295 No DAC For SEO and user clarity, it is still worth using the phrase CJC-1295 No DAC, but the article should explain the terminology clearly
Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Experientia , 52, 871-873
If you go to the latter, youll see that the research information on the Life Extension website is divided into six sections: Health Protocols Magazine Archive The Wellness Blog Health News Clinical Research (for people who wish to participate in trials) The Life Extension Newsletter Interestingly, the Wellness Blog and Health News both provide similar information, but there really isnt a clear distinction between the purposes of each, making it a bit confusing as to why the two exist as separate entities
